Viewpoint: Liturgy is Work, Not ‘Fun’ or Entertainment

byย M. Francis Mannion

I was taken aback recently when a sixth-grader from our parish school told me as he left the church with his classmates after a school Mass that he thought the Mass that day was โ€œfun.โ€ I tried to interpret this in benign terms, thinking that the young manโ€™s liturgical vocabulary was still underdeveloped. Yet, I still wince at the thought that Mass is โ€œfun.โ€

Because we live in a society notable for its entertainment and consumer culture, we are easily inclined to see everything in entertainment and consumer terms. It is striking how often the word โ€œentertainmentโ€ appears in our language. And we conconsciously speak of ourselves as entertainment consumers, and we see the process by which entertainment is created as an โ€œindustry.โ€

The person with a consumer/entertainment mentality treats the world like a giant supermarket or place of entertainment. In such a climate, people, created things, the gifts and talents of others, relationship, sexualityโ€”all are considered objects of consumption.

When we come to worship, it is easy to bring an entertainment mentality with us. With our cultural outlook, we can think that we go to worship to be served and entertained. (This is especially true in the area of liturgical music.)

Such an expectation brings quick disappointment. People who go to Mass with such an expectation will get very little out of the liturgy and are apt to find it dull and boring.

Needless to say, the liturgy should never be dull and boring; it has its festive and emotionally satisfying dimensions. The ritual, music, and preaching should be conducted with grace, and be spiritually uplifting and humanly attractive.

But if the model of the supermarket or entertainment industry is not appropriate to the liturgy, what model would one put in its place? In my view, one of the most valuable and authentic ways of viewing the liturgy is as work, good, solid work. Indeed this is exactly what the word โ€œliturgyโ€ means: the work of the people. Liturgy is the Opus Dei,the ย work which God enacts for our salvation. Now, if the liturgy is work, this means that it is often challenging and demanding. Like many things in life, liturgy demands a great deal from us, and we know in faith that what it demands will rebound to our benefit.

It is no accident that the liturgy is called a โ€œschool of prayer.โ€ In the English church, the scripture readings were traditionally called โ€œlessons.โ€ The word of God is read as judgment and challenge.

In Christian history, it was commonplace to speak of certain kinds of activities and prayers as โ€œspiritual exercises.โ€ (St. Ignatius wrote his famous Spiritual Exercises between 1522ย  and 1524, and they are as popular today as ever.) The spiritual exercise is a very helpful way of understanding the liturgy and what it requires of us.

We know from experience how important discipline is in every aspect of life. Going to school is a discipline that not everyone enjoys. Being able to do a job well requires the discipline that comes from education and the development of skills. We know how athletes go to exhaustive lengths to prepare themselves for the Olympics and similar contests.

In recent decades, people have become very conscious of the importance of diet and exercise. Almost nobody enjoys a diet. Many people enjoy exercise, but others (like me) do not. But, we know that they are good for us in the long run and we will enjoy their benefits.

Worship demands sacrifice, dedication, and costly commitment. But liturgy is not fun!

Msgr. Mannion is pastor emeritus of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church in Salt Lake City. Reprinted by permission of Catholic News Agency.

Francis Mannion

Please leave a reply.

Comments

28 responses to “Viewpoint: Liturgy is Work, Not ‘Fun’ or Entertainment”

  1. Bobby Stritch

    In the words of the great Sergeant Hulka:

    “Lighten up, Francis.”

    1. Charles Day

      @Bobby Stritch:
      No kidding!

      Honestly, isn’t a 6th grader enjoying Mass a good thing?

    2. Paul Inwood

      @Bobby Stritch:

      +1

      The application of the concept of homo ludens to liturgy is not new.

  2. Scott Pluff

    I would take that sixth-grader’s comment as a compliment of the quality and joyful character of the liturgy. When people use words like “fun, spirited, uplifting, or upbeat” to describe liturgy, those may be ways of saying “engaging.” I agree that liturgy should not aim to be fun, but it should be engaging. And not just engaging for the few who have refined tastes in ritual and music, but engaging for the average Joe who walks through the door of an average parish on Sunday.

    If someone is uplifted by renaissance polyphony or a rousing organ voluntary, the aesthetes say they are taking part in the festivity of proper worship. But if someone is uplifted by the sound of a gospel choir or a praise band, then some would accuse them of being shallow, seeking entertainment instead of worship. I call NONSENSE on that line of reasoning, it’s pure elitism.

  3. Ronald C Chochol

    Msgr Mannion:
    Aside from your introductory paragraph and the last sentence of your reflection I enjoyed and profited from your reflections (as I usually do). However, although I obviously don’t know the sixth grader you refer to nor what he actually means by his comment, from my own experience with kids at Mass (over a period of 51 years) I am inclined to agree with the three previous comments. He might have a limited vocabulary to describe his experience but I suspect that if you actually explored it with him, you would be pleased with his comment. Over the years many adults have said to me after Mass, much to my astonishment: “Father, you celebrate Mass as though you actually believe in what you are doing!” Maybe the sixth grader is saying something similar to you. But why not explore it with him and let all of us know what he really had in mind. It might be a real blessing for your ministry.

  4. fred moleck

    Be careful. If the chid was enjoying it too much or if I am enjoying it too much and if the assembly is enjoying it too much…..it might be sinful, — not!. fred moleck

  5. jeff armbruster

    I completely agree that liturgy should not be experienced as just another consumer event, like the opening of a new James Bond movie. Msgr. Mannion is perhaps right to worry that parishioners experience Mass as just a bad or boring movie because our culture doesn’t provide a lot of alternative models for having a satisfying experience. Most people don’t know how to experience high art either, or classical music. For those who do, however, there can be moments of joy and happiness that are more profound than the cheap consumer experiences we’re all too familiar with. Certainly Mass can be like this as well in its own way.

    For me, the time for spiritual exercises and work is more likely to occur outside of Mass, in contemplation or in works of charity for example. I see nothing wrong with Mass being a celebration. Don’t we receive the Eucharist as a lifting of judgement, not an enforcement of the same, if we are honest in our approach. And so definitely a cause for joy!

  6. Joshua Vas

    Re: all the “lighten-up” comments….I think such comments miss the mark of the piece.

    I took the piece not as the child being censored for thinking liturgy is “fun”. I’m sure someone of Msgr. Mannion’s pastoral experience knows what children mean and how they use vocabulary.

    Rather, the child’s comment prompted a reflection in Msgr. Mannion about the types of paradigms in which liturgical celebration is viewed and whether liturgy is perceived or approached in terms of entertainment by people far older than that child….and what, according to him, are the cons of such thinking.

  7. We speak of “playing” music, and at least the musical part of liturgy should be play, not work. I think we can be cautious about thinking that any one term captures or denies the essence of liturgy. I’m inclined to go easy on the young lad and the pastor emeritus both. If “working” at good liturgy means we put effort into our “fun” with God, so be it. Children work very hard at having fun–watch kids do legos or even–heaven forbid!–video games. At the very least, we can go 22nd annotation on the kid and Fr Mannion and inquire more deeply: What did you mean by what you said?

  8. Rod Hall

    Of all that I have read here, I think this is one of the most splendid reflections offered by the good Monsignor. He says it all very well indeed and succinctly provides an essential corrective to a contemporary mindset…a mindset that is completely incorrect. The experience of liturgy as festive, yes. Emotionally satisfying, yes. Spiritually uplifting, yes. But fun? No. Decidedly not. It’s an inappropriate descriptive — and if that is the reaction it evoked, something is wrong. And for just the reasons he so well articulates.

  9. Philip Sandstrom

    I think it is necessary to distinguish between ‘entertainment’ and ‘fun’.
    “Fun’ is that sense of joy and satisfaction that one is where one is supposed to be — like the hebrew word ‘asher’ that lies behind the ‘makarios’ or ‘benedictus’ in the Beatitudes — and is used in the psalms to indicate this reassuring contentment. [It is a bit like the satisfaction one feels when arriving some place using a map, or compass, or GPS — of being ‘on target’ — here for the Christian life. So not ‘entertainment’ but truly ‘fun’ in the Presence of the Holy Trinity.] Liturgy, Western and Eastern, can introduce that reaction!

  10. Pรกdraig McCarthy

    “Now, if the liturgy is work, this means that it is often challenging and demanding.” And that is why it is fun! The young man was clearly not trying to use liturgical vocabulary, but life vocabulary.
    Can we say that God had fun creating the world, and seeing that it was very good? Zephaniah 3:17 says:
    “He will rejoice over you with happy song,
    he will renew you by his love,
    He will dance with shouts of joy for you
    as on a day of festival.”
    Isn’t that fun? Isn’t that liturgy?

    Joseph Ratzinger many years ago offered reflections on Bavarian radio on major Catholic holidays. This is part of one reflection:
    “Jesus is Isaac, who, risen from the dead, comes down from the mountain with the laughter of joy in his face. All the words of the Risen One manifest this joyโ€”this laughter of redemption: If you see what I see and have seen, if you catch a glimpse of the whole picture, you will laugh! (cf. Jn 16:20).
    In the Baroque period the liturgy used to include the “risus paschalis,” the Easter laughter. The Easter homily had to contain a story that made people laugh, so that the church resounded with a joyful laughter. That may be a somewhat superficial form of Christian joy. But is there not something very beautiful and appropriate about laughter becoming a liturgical symbol?”
    It’s found in his book: Images of Hope: Meditations on Major Feasts (Ignatius Press, 2006), page 50.

  11. Alan Hommerding

    The most validated I’ve ever felt as a church musician was the Sunday that we’d sung Fred Kaan’s “For the Healing of the Nations” to the tune ST. THOMAS (Tantum Ergo). After Mass, out in the parking lot, a young boy – I’m guessing about fourth grade or so – had rolled up the bulletin into a herald-trumpet shape and was marching around, trumpeting the hymn tune. It was, to me, a signal that something of the work of the liturgy was being carried into the world. And somebody had forgotten to tell him that fourth-graders don’t like traditional hymn tunes.
    The CSL doesn’t mention fun or entertainment. But it does say that the assembly should not be there as strangers or silent spectators. The liturgy is not a spectacle to be viewed passively by spectators, especially if if that’s caused by the liturgy being strange or unfamiliar to them. (I like the Latin “extranei” – they aren’t extraneous to the action.)
    The liturgy can be fun, but shouldn’t be ONLY fun, or have that as its goal; but sometimes the Spirit can lead us there. Same with entertainment – it’s bound to be a part of the liturgy, since there are actors (at least one in costume), a stage, and a script. But it’s not ONLY entertainment, especially the kind of SPECtacle that SPECtators only view passively. In our very visually-oriented and -driven culture, those of us who prepare liturgy need to be cautious about an optically-driven rite.
    We are created in the divine image; I’d like to think that’s why we can have fun sometimes, and be serious sometimes, and be entertained sometimes, and be involved sometimes. Because God is and does all those things, too – that’s where we got it.

  12. Tom Lella

    Wow! A middle-school aged young man was genuinely touched by something at that liturgical prayer that moved him to give voice to his enthusiasm–to the presider none-the-less–and we’re trying to parse that into whether or not there is/isn’t/should be/shouldn’t be an entertainment quality to the liturgy. We should be rejoicing and shouting from the roof-tops that a young person gets it. He is the future of our church. Let’s hope his enthusiasm carries on into adulthood.

  13. Steve Woodland

    when I was a lad, just starting to serve Mass, It was unquestionably fun. Not ha-ha fun like Disneyland, but enjoyable none the less. It led me to my vocation as a priest, where, nearly thirty years later, I’m still having fun.

  14. Anne Mullen

    Tom Lella # 13
    AGREED!

  15. Sean Keeler

    When I was a sixth grader, some of the hardest work we did was play baseball. Hot, sweaty, exhausting, HARD work. But yes, it was fun. With the right coach, we learned that it was fun regardless of the game’s outcome. Our coach would go around the team and point out to each of us something we had done right to help out the team, even if it was ‘not dropping as many balls today’. It made us feel part of something. So we could be happy/victorious and say it was fun, or sad/losers and say it was fun.

    Mass is much the same thing when seen through those eyes. But it is often, for better or worse, in the hands of the celebrant to help us see that. Mass can be a rich, rewarding experience or a monotonous drudgery. Hard work? Sure. But the whole purpose is to celebrate our relationship with God and His promise of salvation. If that can’t be uplifting and rewarding — if that can’t be fun — then there’s damned little fun in God’s creation.

  16. Matthew J. Meloche

    Executing music for Mass is “hard work” – but it is the most fun I have all week. Practicing? Not fun. Making worship aids? Not fun. Meetings? Really not fun. Playing the organ at Mass? Directing a choir? A blast.

  17. Jonathan Day

    Janos Starker, the great cellist and teacher, was famous for being incredibly demanding about technique and discipline. He had a shocking level of control of the instrument โ€“ left/right hand co-ordination, precision in shifting. His vibrato was tightly focused because his intonation was always razor-sharp, no matter how difficult a piece he was playing. Starker always appeared impassive when he played, never using histrionics or wild gestures. His goal, he said, was to create excitement rather than to get excited himself.

    He demanded as much from his students. One of them remembers a class in which

    โ€ฆ the three who played before me were quivering puddles of goo by the time he was done with them, and then he simply looked at me, raised an eyebrow, and proceeded to get a fresh cigarette as I set up, trying not to actually shake as I did so.

    And yet, in multiple interviews, Starker spoke of the difference between โ€œplayingโ€ and โ€œworkingโ€ at the cello; many children, he said, learned quickly and well because they were able to โ€œplayโ€, where adult learners (and many of his advanced students ended up re-learning the instrument, almost from the ground up) often quarrelled with the instrument, โ€œworkingโ€ it.

    I think something like this applies to liturgy. Play โ€“ serious play โ€“ can be challenging and demanding. It can involve considerable discipline and demanding practice. It isnโ€™t easy to get an entire assembly (congregation and ministers) to a point where a complex liturgy simply โ€œhappensโ€ in a natural and almost inevitable way. But it can be done; and at this stage, the liturgy truly is โ€œplayโ€, not โ€œworkโ€ at all.

    See also Proverbs 8.30.

  18. Jack Feehily

    I truly enjoy offering the Liturgy with the people I serve. It is always an engaging experience. But it does involve work and I don’t experience it as fun.

  19. “It is not work, but play. To be at play, or to fashion a work of art in God’s sight – not to create, but to exist – such is the essence of the liturgy” (Romano Guardini, The Spirit of the Liturgy, London 1937)

  20. Fr. Dave Riley

    On Wednesday, November 4, before there were any comments posted I glanced at this post enough to see the topic. I then went across the street to prepare to celebrate Mass. Sitting in the sanctuary vested fifteen minutes before we began, I thought about Mass being called “fun.” To an 11 or 12 year old this may have positive meaning.

    However, assuming that “fun” is not the word you would want to use as a priest or musician, what word(s) would you use? I began making a list in my head. What words would be on your list?

    If you are a priest celebrating Mass, what words would those present say about the Mass they just celebrated with you?

    Also in the context of Mass, what words would be the opposite of “fun?”

    I have found these questions helpful and prayerful. Therefore I really enjoyed Msgr Mannion’s post.

  21. Doug O'Neill

    Some of these comments are contrasting “play” and “work,” which are not opposed to one another. We work hard so that we can play. When I am practicing, it is work. When I plan, it is work. We work hard so that we can play and reap the fruits of our labor. I’m with Matthew – I enjoy thoroughly what I do, but it’s both work and play at the same time. I’m exhausted after a good liturgy.

    Msgr. Mannion makes a salient point that we should consider as we plan worship, that the point is not entertainment at all. Is there a line between ministering to people’s pastoral needs and giving them what they want all the time? Is giving them what they want ministering to them, or it is pleasing them? Or both? Can that “pastoral” judgment in planning liturgical music ever include music that they are not especially fond of right away, if we are convinced it is good for the soul? When we talk about “engaging” liturgies, there is both a need for the planners to make it engaging, and for the people to engage their hearts and minds.

  22. I don’t think “play” and “work” are antonyms. But neither are “play” and “entertainment” synonyms. If the young lad had said, “I was entertained,” as his younger siblings might say if they stuffed their back-pew mouths with cheerios as they tore through picture books, then yes, there’s a problem.

    The more salient problem is with people who treat the liturgy like they’re sourpusses attending a funeral. Oh wait … somebody said something about that recently, didn’t they?

    I sure hope that if young parishioners are answering that question with “Boring!” that the clergy are paying attention and putting some extra elbow grease into the homilies. And, with more than 400 households, making sure they have a full-time music director on board.

  23. Ed Nash

    A sixth grader says Mass is fun and is misunderstood because fun is not a quality of liturgy…

    “Fun” to a sixth grader means a desire to return. “Not fun” to a sixth grader means a desire and then effort to not return.

    The best way to get a sixth grader to return is to allow them to smile, sing, remember, and a donut. And it works for adults too.

  24. Doug O'Neill

    I’m not sure why so many have dwelled on interpreting the boy’s remark. Msgr. Mannion was using that story as a departure for a large issue. Few of these comments have actually engaged the subject matter, perhaps because it makes us uneasy? This is not a style issue either; it cuts across divides. High art music has the capability to entertain, for instance.

    1. @Doug O’Neill:
      To your point, I think that good liturgy should engage people, not entertain them. Asking the boy what made it “fun” would be a better response than, “That’s not what I expected.”

      All our parishioners may not have the vocabulary of theology and spirituality but I don’t think they have to be mystics to get a sense of engagement from worship. They need pastors and liturgists who are of a mind of spiritual directors–certainly not entertainers.

      The alternative is a worship divorced from people’s concerns, that tells them (in so many words) that here is the Mass, take it or leave it as it is.

  25. Dr. Cajetan Coelho

    Saint Ignatius of Loyola – Pray for us.


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading