Liturgy in Collegeville: From the Archives – Part VI

Pray Tell is running a series on the liturgical history of Collegeville. The sub-series “From the Archives” reprints some of the Liturgy Committee meeting minutes from 1963 to 1969. This sub-series is a behind-the-scenes look at liturgy in Collegeville during and immediately after the Second Vatican Council.

 

The next record from the Liturgy Committee:

Minutes of the Liturgy Committee

October 10, 1963

Present were Fathers John, Daniel, Michael, Gerard, Aelred, Camillus, Wenceslaus, Leon, Fr. Adam, and Bro. Gerard.

In view of Father Abbot’s plan to have the community continue its discussion on the liturgy on October 22, the liturgical committee decided that papers be prepared in advance and be passed out among the community to serve as a possible basis for discussion on Oct 22. Papers were envisaged on topics such as indirect participation, the conventual Mass, and the structure of Eucharistic liturgy. Father Michael proposed that some literature on the liturgy be made available to the community, such as the Instruction of Pope Pius XII of 1958, etc. Father Daniel referred to Clifford Howell’s discussion of the problem of Gregorian Chant in his writings.

The committee discussed what form of Mass to suggest to Father Abbot for the future Sundays. Father Gerard suggested having a cantata on Oct. 20 in order to prepare the people for a suggested High Mass on Oct. 27. This led to a discussion of whether any form of liturgy without readings in the vernacular could be called good liturgy. At the end of the discussion the committee agreed to suggest the following forms of Sunday conventual Mass to the Abbot: Oct. 20—Low Mass; Oct. 27—missa cum deacono; Nov. 1 and Nov. 3—Solemn High Mass (since our students would not be here); Nov. 10, 17, 24, and Dec. 1—solemnized Low Masses; Dec. 8—missa cum deacono. One of the problems considered in conjunction with the question of what forms of Sunday Mass to suggest to Father Abbot was that by having solemn liturgical forms on the great feasts we seem to render the liturgy more inaccessible to our people precisely at a time when we would be making it more accessible to them. European liturgists especially have noted this tendency.

In regard to the afternoon of November 1, the committee recommended that Vespers be celebrated at their proper time, instead of having the time advanced as has been customary, and that private visits to the cemetery should be made instead of a visit in procession.

The committee then accepted Fr. Adam’s suggestion that we recommend the purchase of more Gelinenu psalm books.

What disturbs many members of the committee is the custom of the heb. [Weekly Prayer Leader] entering the sanctuary before terce has properly been ended. The idea of “saving as much time as possible” does not seem compatible with the idea of “celebrating” Mass. Therefore, on days when hymns are sung the beh, [sic – heb.] should not enter the sanctuary until the hymn has been intoned.

The committee also decided that when the Brothers begin attending conventual Mass, the readings should be in the vernacular. This would be in line with the principle that the Word of God should be proclaimed in such a way and language that it be immediately understood.

A new translation of the Gloria, that is, other than the one contained in Our Parish Prays and Sings, was considered by the committee in its possible use for future Sundays, but it was not accepted on the grounds that it would be too confusing for our students. One suggestion towards solving the problem of undesirable translations would be to substitute new books for use by the students and congregation.

Other topics raised and briefly discussed were the possibilities of having students serve for the first shift of Masses so that they could communicate in the Masses and thus have fuller participation than our Brothers can have (they communicate at a previous Mass) and that of using a page-board on Sundays.

Nathan Chase

Nathan P. Chase is Assistant Professor of Liturgical and Sacramental Theology at Aquinas Institute of Theology in St. Louis, MO. He has contributed a number of articles to the field of liturgical studies, including pieces on liturgy in the early Church, initiation, the Eucharist, inculturation, and the Western Non-Roman Rites, in particular the Hispano-Mozarabic tradition. His first book The Homiliae Toletanae and the Theology of Lent and Easter was published in 2020. His second monograph, published in 2023, is titled The Anaphoral Tradition in the ‘Barcelona Papyrus.’

Please leave a reply.

Comments

4 responses to “Liturgy in Collegeville: From the Archives – Part VI”

  1. Peter Kwasniewski

    “Solemn High Mass (since our students would not be here); … by having solemn liturgical forms on the great feasts we seem to render the liturgy more inaccessible to our people precisely at a time when we would be making it more accessible to them.”

    So, in short, the richest, most beautiful, and most expressive form of the liturgy — the one that is in most respects the most ancient and authentic, and bears the most likeness to the Christian East — is not to be broken open like bread for the students, but used only when they are not around; the solemnity and the chanting are seen as a barrier to comprehension rather than a summons to the holy, immortale, awesome, life-creating mysteries of Christ.

    As Gregory DiPippo explained today at NLM:

    “Before World War I, the major figures in the Liturgical Movement believed that instilling true devotion to the liturgy, and curing the neglect thereof, was principally a matter of education. The liturgy was seen as an inexhaustible treasure-trove for the spiritual life, and the goal of men such as Dom Guéranger and Fr Romano Guardini was to raise both the clergy and the laity up to a greater appreciation of it. In the period between the wars, the attitude shifted towards the idea that if the run of the clergy and faithful were disinterested in the liturgy, the problem lay not with them, but with the liturgy. The cure for this neglect would then become, not to educate the faithful up to the level of the liturgy, but to alter the liturgy to suit the needs of ‘modern’ man.”

    The early pioneers of the Liturgical Movement would carefully and lovingly explain the liturgy to their people; the later ones sought rather to change it so that it needed no explanation. The first loved the liturgy as a treasure handed down and deserving reverence, the second saw it as a product to be tinkered with and engineered by a committee, like this one. In the process, participation was cheapened because its content was reduced to the level of human reason, not elevated to the…

    1. @Peter Kwasniewski – comment #1:
      Perhaps the early pioneers came to see that their explanations were too involved and long-winded, that they lacked roots in the Scriptures, that they had no bearing on God’s movement among the people. They might have loved the liturgy no more than the “later ones.”

      It seems to me that the early pioneers were appealing more to the “level of human reason,” and the later ones more open to the touch of God in the experience of the liturgy, less encumbered and less explained.

      The very necessity of explanation veers us close to the fault of gnosticism, in which great secrets are kept from the vast masses until their readiness to ask or to hear from the in-crowd.

      On the other hand, saving time … bah!

  2. Matthew J. Meloche

    Many thanks to you all, to Collegeville, and to Pray Tell for posting these entries… they are truly fascinating reads. If anyone else has committee minutes or in depth looks into the liturgical-situation in the 1950s-1970s that have not been published, I urge you to either post them on the internet or find a way to get them out there.

  3. Rob Stoltz

    I find it interesting that a translation of the Gloria was at issue. By this time, surely, portions of the mass in the vernacular said “over the top” of a Low Mass celebrated in Latin, was “not the done thing.”


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading