Opposition to Pope Francis’ Reforms in the Vatican?

โ€œPope Francisโ€™ Reform Plans Encounter Opposition,โ€ RP Online (Germany) reports, citing Vaticanologist Albert Link. The occasion was the appearance Monday of the book by Link, Buonanotte und Buonasera. Zwei Pรคpste im Vatikan (โ€œGood Night and Good Evening. Two Popes in the Vaticanโ€).

Many in the Vatican miss Pope Benedict XVI as a โ€œfatherly employerโ€ and feel angst about the future. Even though there is โ€œfundamental sympathyโ€ for Francis, opposition to his reform plans are perceptible at all levels in the Vatican, Link said.

โ€œThe lower-level workers have the impression that, through the bringing in of the management consultant McKinsey, rumors of a reduction in size of the curia, and elimination of their retirement provisions, an example is to be set of a church of the poor.โ€

Higher level officials have gathered, from Francisโ€™ appearances so far, that he is serious about a transformation. โ€œHe himself is driven through Rome in a used car, and he has pretty much forbidden big cars to everyone else in the Vatican. He clearly has cardinals and bishops in mind,โ€ Link said.

In the political realm, Francis appears as an actor in his own right and not just the โ€œrepresentative of diplomatic political activity happening in secret.โ€ Link referred toย his prayer for peace in the Vatican with Israeli President Peres and Palestinian President Abbas, and his desire to fly to conflict-ridden Iraq himself. โ€œThese are all new sounds that indicate that he will present himself more politically than Benedict XVI, and even than John Paul II,โ€ Link said.

Anthony Ruff, OSB

Fr. Anthony Ruff, OSB, is a monk of St. John's Abbey. He teaches liturgy, liturgical music, and Gregorian chant at St. John's University School of Theology-Seminary. He is widely published and frequently presents across the country on liturgy and music. He is the author of Sacred Music and Liturgical Reform: Treasures and Transformations, and of Responsorial Psalms for Weekday Mass: Advent, Christmas, Lent, Easter. He does priestly ministry at the neighboring community of Benedictine sisters in St. Joseph.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

19 responses to “Opposition to Pope Francis’ Reforms in the Vatican?”

  1. Mark Kieffer

    Good. It’s about time that curial officials got concerned!

  2. Sean Whelan

    Thank God! What part of getting on your knees and washing feet don’t these hierarchs get?

  3. Peter Haydon

    I wonder what sort of employer retrospectively cuts the pension entitlements of its employees.
    A pension is deferred pay. My old “Penny” catechism notes (327) that one of the four sins crying out to heaven for vengeance is “Defrauding labourers of their wages.” The current CCC reference seems to be 2434.
    The wives and children of the employees also are likely to suffer from such changes if implemented.
    Surely the church should set n example as a model employer?

    1. Dismas Bede

      @Peter Haydon – comment #3:
      “Impression” and “Rumors” are very different from an established and declared plan of action. Francis’ “poor church for the poor” would hardly seem to be an unjust church… particularly toward those in need.
      As for the “higher ups” trembling a bit… as Francis often says, “Cosi sia.”

    2. Jim Pauwels

      @Peter Haydon – comment #3:

      “I wonder what sort of employer retrospectively cuts the pension entitlements of its employees. A pension is deferred pay. My old โ€œPennyโ€ catechism notes (327) that one of the four sins crying out to heaven for vengeance is โ€œDefrauding labourers of their wages.โ€ The current CCC reference seems to be 2434.”

      I agree that it would seem harsh to take away pension benefits that have been promised. But we should also recognize the situation for what it is. Pensions entail risk. In the case of the Vatican’s pension plan for its employees, the risk is that the pension funds are underfunded. Francis did not create this problem but he must address it.

      When workers accept pension benefits, they are accepting the risk that the projected (which is not the same as promised/guaranteed) annuity will not materialize. Undoubtedly, workers should be more educated in this than many are. There is no such thing as a risk-free retirement plan, as even government workers in the US are learning.

      This recent article from Fortune Magazine is a good primer on Vatican finances, Vatican employee compensation and the pension underfunding issue, and has some further details on Francis’ financial reforms.

      http://fortune.com/2014/08/14/this-pope-means-business/

      1. Peter Haydon

        @Jim Pauwels – comment #7:
        Thank you Jim.
        I wonder how accurate the article is. Readers of Private Eye will have little faith in the consultancy firms employed.
        There is a difference between a cleric, who places faith in the diocese or order to provide for him and who may take a vow of poverty and a paid employee who has a duty to provide for his family. A “church of the poor” should still be a fair employer.
        I suspect that part of the problem is the lack of training in financial management for senior clerics: just as junior officers in an army are sent to an officer training academy, corresponding to seminary for priests, there are staff colleges for senior officers but none for bishops or senior clerics. Our former bishop recounted that, as a tall person, he was advised to duck when wearing a mitre before going through a doorway. Valid but inadequate as preparation for his role.

      2. Jim Pauwels

        @Peter Haydon – comment #9:

        Yes, it was kind of interesting that the Fortune piece treats the Holy Father as another CEO to be lionized. I suppose there is some truth to that image: keeping the church on a sound financial footing is one part of the job, and in fact seems to be a primary reason that he was elected pope.

        I’m sure you’re right that clerics are better clerics than they are CFOs. I understand that there is formal coursework for new pastors. Whether there is something equivalent for new bishops – not to mention continuing-education requirements – I don’t know, but it seems like a good idea. At any rate, acknowledging the limitations of clerical management expertise seems like a good reason to bring in the best and brightest available of the laity, who really are experts at auditing, banking, actuarial science and whatever other skill sets are necessary to right the Holy See’s financial ship.

        I wish Francis well, and with you, I hope that no employee suffers a setback in retirement earnings as a result of the reforms.

      3. Peter Haydon

        @Jim Pauwels – comment #10:
        Thank you Jim.
        As an accountant working in a bank I have less faith in the consultants than you do. Let us hope that your faith is better founded than my doubts.

  4. Fr. Jack Feehily

    The mission of Jesus brought him face to face with suffering and death. He showed the depth of his love by forsaking every form of worldly glory. The critics of Francis, I fear, want to cling to what they have known, a church which enjoys the illusion of power through its willingness to lord it over their subjects. Francis, like Mary of Bethany, has chosen the better part by subjecting himself to the words of his master. Perhaps he too will be betrayed and exposed to his foes and escorted outside the city gates. He’s following Jesus, so I’m following him.

  5. Todd Orbitz

    Sean Whelan : Thank God! What part of getting on your knees and washing feet donโ€™t these hierarchs get?

    I think they get it fine. In fact, most of them with jurisdiction actually do it.

    Perhaps you are misunderstanding the symbology?

    1. Sean Whelan

      @Todd Orbitz – comment #6:

      Uh, what bishops do you think “get it?”

  6. Christopher Queen

    I have a good friend, working as a corporate consultant. She remarks that changing the governance and structure of a large organization is very difficult, but that this pales in comparison when it comes to changing the culture at a large organization.

    I think that this might serve as a helpful analogy to understand the hopes, fears, and stresses going on at a Vatican thinking about general overhaul.

  7. Jim Pauwels

    Peter – I’m an MBA – I’m pro-consultant ๐Ÿ™‚

    1. Peter Haydon

      @Jim Pauwels – comment #12:
      Good on you Jim. I trust that you try to add value. Too many, I fear, seem better at extracting value for themselves particularly when the customer is the tax payer.

  8. Mary Wood

    Surprising that those who dislike Pope Francis’ thoughts and actions would oppose them. All they have to do with an old man who will retire or die within two years is to keep their heads below the parapet and remind themselves, “This too will pass.”

    1. Jim Pauwels

      @Mary Wood – comment #13:

      I am going to be bitterly disappointed if Francis isn’t setting precedents that will, for all practical purposes, bind his successors. If his successor reverts to the old business-as-usual, the crisis that precipitates will shake the church more than anything we’ve seen in our lives. Francis has struck a sort of harmonic sympathy with people’s hopes and yearnings. There is just no way that church leadership can look upon that as a temporary anomaly or a non-essential accident.

      I hope Francis has raised the bar significantly for episcopal appointments, too. I want another Francis sitting in our cathedra. I’d imagine that Catholics all over the world feel similarly.

      1. Karl Liam Saur

        @Jim Pauwels – comment #14:
        I have no expectations. Expectations are pre-meditated resentments, so they are baggage for me.

        I do have hope, which is a rather different thing from expectations.

  9. While reading this column and its responses, I was thinking, sadly, of a characteristic that is a part of my family members background-Alcoholism. I’m not saying that the Curia, etc, in Rome are alcoholics or addicts, but I see some similar traits from living with my large family. My uncle who drank profusely (sadly, he died an Alcoholic) had some “common symptoms.”

    At first denied that there was a problem, even when he was approached by other family members and friends. He told them to mind their own business. He didn’t have a problem, even though it was very obvious.

    Friends and family members would start to avoid him, all due to his behavior. He would always complain “why can’t all of you be like you used to be? What’s wrong with you people?!” He was unwilling to change or see that there WAS a problem.

    When it finally started to sink in, he admitted that he had a *small* problem. At the same time, however, he blamed everyone else for his disease–“YOU caused me to drink….” “It’s not MY fault. People treated me badly because they were jealous….” “They never understood me….” He would never admit that he himself was part of the problem.

    He claimed he could control it, but, of course, he couldn’t; it was eating away at him. He finally died of Cirrhosis of the Liver, never realizing that there could be any type of healing.

    From my personal family perspective, I see similar behavior in the Church, myself included, since I am also a part of Her. The Right blames the Left for the Church’s problems, and vice-verce. Others deny that there even is a problem. Others say that life was better before than what it is now; why can’t we go back to the way things used to be (before VII or after). Many don’t want to take responsibility; ‘it’s their problem, let them live and deal with it. There will be a new Pope soon, anyway….’ There are grains of truth in these arguments, but not the full truth. There are also lies and deceptions and manipulations and denials running everywhere…

  10. Pat Barkey

    oops…my tablet didn’t tell me I was out of spaces. Sorry.

    As the human aspect of the Church, Francis-like his predecessors before him in their own ways-is trying to bring the Church back into Recovery, of which I am part of. It’s not an easy process. Addicts won’t change and be in Recovery unless they really want to. The Church will always have to be vigilant. An Alcoholic will go into relapse with one drink.

    But there is always hope; otherwise, we wouldn’t have groups like AA or NA or OA or SA. We wouldn’t have need of the Holy Spirit or Grace, or the Gifts of the HS. “With God, all things are possible!”

    Because of my family history, in seminary I used to volunteer my time by driving addicts in Recovery, who couldn’t get there on their own, to 12-step meetings. I benefited just as much as they did, although I had never been drunk (I still to this day have never been drunk) or had taken drugs or been addicted to food or sex. These meetings usually ended with the same phrase, which I will close here:

    “Keep coming back. It works if you work it. So, work it-you’re worth it!”


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading