Interviewing Liturgical Leaders: Gordon Lathrop

Pray Tell is doing a series of interviews with liturgical leaders. It is loosely inspired by a series in Time Magazine. Each interviewee was asked to be witty, engaging and humorous in their responses. The views expressed in their responses are not necessarily those of Pray Tell.

Here is what we receivedโ€ฆ

 

Why are you in liturgy?

When I was 9, my pastor asked me to be an acolyte. That duty, in a Lutheran mission church of the time, involved lighting the candles, holding the baptismal bowl, and picking up the communion glasses from the kneeling communicants. Sometimes I think I am simply still doing that. Though I have fought for bigger fonts and for exchanging those glasses for a shared cup, I still see the faces of those communicants. Other times I think Suzanne Langer finally got to me: we need stronger, better public symbols to hold and orient us in the world. Christian liturgyโ€”or, rather, Christian liturgy unboundโ€”has at least some of those symbols. Yet other times I think the Bible got to me: it is most powerfully at home in a celebrating assembly being formed by its images.

 

Three things to be fixed in the liturgy โ€“ what would they be?

Ah, simple! The leaders should lovingly serve; the central symbols should be (as Bob Hovda repeatedly said) made larger; and the assembly should actively participate, including finally in the sending to a needy world. Or, maybe not so simple. How do you combine leadership and service? What central symbols should be made larger? And what would such sending really be like? A deeper fix might help us with all of those questions: make sure the gospel of Jesus Christ is what the meeting is about.

 

Pope Francis: good for liturgical renewal or not?

I understand the anxiety of people who say that an Argentinian Peronist not uncommonly signals a left turn and then turns right. But even were that so, those signals from this man have been remarkable and, like all really good liturgy, will not be forgotten and cannot be taken back. When he was introduced on the balcony, there was no stole and no blessing until first he asked for the people of Rome to pray for their new bishop (โ€œbishop,โ€ he said!) and bowed to them as they prayed. That is a man who has come to know what โ€œThe Lord be with you/And also with youโ€ means. Perhaps he can help English-speaking Roman Catholics get those ecumenical words back. In any case, that first sign he enacted can help us all with the meaning. Many subsequent signs have also helped. I just hope we donโ€™t eat him up with expecting too much. Expecting everything from one man is always wrong and itself contradicts the spirit of the liturgy, though such expectations seems to be a standard problem with the increasingly monarchical papacy in a time of โ€œcelebrity.โ€ Francis himself seems to know this. I hope we all can know that both monarchy and celebrity are bad ideas.

 

Is academic liturgical study relevant to the real world? And would you advise a young person to go into it?

Good grief, yes! Can you imagine any other field that engages its scholars in theology, biblical studies, history, sociology, psychology, the musical and visual arts, anthropology, and even cosmology, and then turns all that toward real pastoral issues and real life, in the shared search for renewed, communal symbols?

 

How does liturgical scholarship need to change in the next 10 years?

Care again about reform, not simply reporting. And articulate the location and presuppositions of the scholar, combined with a fair measure of self-criticism. And laugh a little.

 

Organized religion isnโ€™t exactly flourishing just now โ€“ are you hopeful about the future?

Hopeful? Yes. And the โ€œnot flourishingโ€ doesnโ€™t particularly worry me. These things come and go. And maybe our churches will be more faithful if they are smaller.

 

How come so many young people donโ€™t go to church? What should we be doing differently?

I donโ€™t know. Maybe our liturgies should be more like the music of Arvo Pรคrt: holy, limpid like a clear bell, open and without easy resolution, full of room for both pain and joy, lament and praise.

 

Favorite place in the world youโ€™d like to worship?

Well, one answer would be either the St. Lawrence Lutheran church of Lohja, Finland, or the St. Herman of Alaska Orthodox church of Tapiola, Finland, the interiors of both of which are entirely covered with amazing wall-painting. I would love to join in the work of the assemblies that use these buildings. And if things got boring and problematicโ€”as they do everywhereโ€”I could always drink in the life and mercy in the wall-paintings!

 

Gordon W. Lathrop is a pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and a retired professor of liturgy. In recent years he has taught at the St. Thomas Aquinas University in Rome, the University of Copenhagen, the Virginia Theological Seminary, and Yale Divinity School. After teaching at the Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia from 1984 until 2004, he was named Professor of Liturgy Emeritus there. He is the author of several books, including Holy Things: A Liturgical Theology (Fortress 1993), Holy People: A Liturgical Ecclesiology (Fortress 1999), Holy Ground: A Liturgical Cosmology (Fortress 2003), The Pastor: A Spirituality (Fortress 2006), and The Four Gospels on Sunday: The New Testament and the Reform of Christian Worship (Fortress 2012). He was a participant in the preparation of Evangelical Lutheran Worship (2006), the current Lutheran service book and hymnal. He is an Editorial Consultant of the journal Worship. In 1985 he was the President of the North American Academy of Liturgy. In 2006 he received that Academyโ€™s Berakah Award. From August 2011 until August 2013 he was President of Societas Liturgica, the international society of scholars in liturgy. In 2011 he received an honorary doctorate in theology from the University of Helsinki, Finland. He lives now in Arlington, Virginia, in the greater Washington DC area.

Editor

Katharine E. Harmon, Ph.D., edits the blog, Pray Tell: Worship, Wit & Wisdom.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

10 responses to “Interviewing Liturgical Leaders: Gordon Lathrop”

  1. Martyn Storey

    I found this very positive, nothing really to disagree with.
    Gordon’s reflections on Francis are spot on – don’t ask too much of a man some of us (me included) have invested much hope in (in far more than liturgy).
    I’m not sure about the young people / Arvo Pรคrt reflection. I’ve recently moved, from a big parish that could do different styles of liturgy, to a smaller but lively inner city one that uses different styles of music on different Sundays depending on the solemnity. Both have a problem of congregational singing, or hesitancy to sing, depending where you sit. I’ve sometimes thought that maybe getting some parishioners together to practice certain things from time to time might be a useful thing that would then encourage others in the congregation. (I’m not sure if my new parish will mange the James MacMillan parish masses … would be good on special occasions, but that’s my thing.)
    Finally, I’d love to know/see more about the Finnish churches Gordon mentions.

    1. Gordon Lathrop

      @Martyn Storey – comment #1:
      Finding something extensive about Lohja may be difficult, Marilyn, (though there are a few pictures at http://www.lohjanseurakunta.fi/354-maalaukset) but there is a wonderful web-site for the Orthodox church in Tapiola where you can essentially navigate through the entire interior, seeing it all. Look at http://www.ortodoksi.net/index.php/Tapiolan_pyhรคn_Herman_Alaskalaisen_kirkko

      1. Gordon Lathrop

        @Gordon Lathrop – comment #5:
        Forgive me! It is Martyn not Marilyn! My eyes are getting worse, I guess. But do look at that amazing web-site.

  2. Tony Phillips

    “That is a man who has come to know what “The Lord be with you/And also with youโ€ means. Perhaps he can help English-speaking Roman Catholics get those ecumenical words back.”

    We don’t want them back, thank you! They’re bad English and bad translation!

    There’s something disconcerting about the very notion of “liturgical leaders.” “Liturgy” is supposed to mean “the work of the people”, not “the work of professional liturgists”. So much of what’s been foisted on us has been unasked for and frankly unwanted.

    “Both have a problem of congregational singing, or hesitancy to sing, depending where you sit.” An interesting observation–and not an uncommon one. Fact is, an awful lot of people don’t want to sing, any more than they want to chime in with the ‘acclamations’ that have been assigned to them since the 1960s. The Tridentine model seems to be reassserting itself, because it springs from fundamentals of human nature.

    1. Paul Inwood

      @Tony Phillips – comment #2:

      We donโ€™t want them back, thank you! Theyโ€™re bad English and bad translation!

      You speak for yourself, and perhaps for a small minority. I don’t see these words as bad English, but would agree that they are not the most elegant solution. For that, you would have to go to the Portugese “The Lord be with you. / He is in our midst.” And Semitic experts would not agree with you that the translation “And also with you” is bad. Indeed, it is better than what we have now.

      So much of whatโ€™s been foisted on us has been unasked for and frankly unwanted.

      Completely inaccurate. It was certainly asked for (see Piero Marini’s “A Challenging Reform” if you don’t believe this), and its departure is greatly mourned by many (though not all!).

      The Tridentine model seems to be reassserting itself, because it springs from fundamentals of human nature.

      I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The Tridentine model appears now to have largely finished reasserting itself in the wake of Benedict’s resignation, and how it can be said to spring from “fundamentals of human nature”, whatever that means, is a mystery.

      1. Gordon Lathrop

        @Paul Inwood – comment #3:
        Thank you very much for your fine comments, Paul. If we could find a more elegant solution to the translation of the Dominus vobiscum dialogue, I would only hope that we would find it ecumenically.

      2. @Paul Inwood – comment #3:
        I’m not sure that expertise in Semitics is determinative of how one thinks that dialogue should be translated. I know of at least one Semitics expert (PhD from Harvard) who is quite happy with the current translation. It seems to me that one’s feelings about “And with you spirit” have more to do with one’s approach to translation and one’s general aesthetic sensibilities that it does with expertise in a particular linguistic family.

  3. Peter Rehwaldt

    The juxtaposition of size and faithfulness is an interesting one. From what I have seen in a variety of Lutheran parishes in California, Kansas, and Missouri, those communities that commit themselves to a deeply faithful sending into the world for service tend to be growing rather than shrinking. Not spectacularly or overnight, but in twos and threes newcomers are being drawn to communities that practice love of neighbor and not merely talk about it.

  4. Peter Rehwaldt

    Gordon, I think your answer to “why are you in liturgy?” speaks very well to the later question about children in worship. Your experience at age 9 was a recognition by your pastor that worship — and indeed, worship leadership — includes children. I’m reminded of the title of Daniel Erlander’s fine book designed for children approaching their first communion: “A Place for You“. When our liturgical vision is broad enough to see children as fully belonging to the assembly as they are, rather than as “Christians-to-be”, both children and adults are enriched. Thankfully, the liturgy (particularly at festivals like Christmas and especially Holy Week and Easter) gives us a glimpse of just such a vision.

    1. Gordon Lathrop

      @Peter Rehwaldt – comment #8:
      You are quite right, Peter. Thank you.


Posted

in

,

by

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading